FTSE 100 ▲ 8,142.55 +0.42% GBP/USD 1.2731 BRENT $84.12 BTC £52,901 BoE base rate 4.75% London 12° Overcast Sterling steady ahead of CPI print FTSE 100 ▲ 8,142.55 +0.42% GBP/USD 1.2731 BRENT $84.12 BTC £52,901 BoE base rate 4.75% London 12° Overcast Sterling steady ahead of CPI print
TechLaw★ Premium

High Court ruling reshapes UK position on AI training data

Judges find that commercial scraping of copyrighted works without licence falls outside text-and-data-mining exceptions.

IW
Imogen Walsh
Yesterday · 6 min read
High Court ruling reshapes UK position on AI training data

A High Court ruling handed down this week has substantially narrowed the circumstances in which AI developers can train models on copyrighted material without licence, finding that the existing text-and-data-mining exception does not extend to large-scale commercial scraping.

The judgment is the first major decision of its kind in the UK and is expected to be relied on heavily by rights-holders pursuing similar cases in the Chancery Division.

Subscriber-only article

Keep reading High Court ruling reshapes UK position on AI training data.

You've read 2 of 5 paragraphs. Unlock the rest of this comment piece — plus every Opinion article — from £1 for your first month.

  • Unlimited access to every Premium article
  • The Daily Briefing newsletter, 6am every weekday
  • Cancel any time. No ads, ever.

Already a subscriber? Sign in to continue reading.

Reader comments

8 comments

On: High Court ruling reshapes UK position on AI training data

Join the discussion

Comments are moderated. Be civil.

  • LC
    Linda ColeBristol · 3 hrs ago

    Lived through the 80s, the 90s, 2008 and Covid. Every generation thinks their crisis is the worst. It rarely is. Calm down everyone.

  • HR
    Hannah ReidEdinburgh · 12 min ago

    Sharing this with my book club tonight. We've been arguing about exactly this for two months.

  • GH
    George HollisBrighton · 2 hrs ago

    I disagree with almost every conclusion in this article and I still want to thank the author for writing it properly.

  • MD
    Mark DanielsCardiff · Yesterday

    Cancelled the Sunday papers years ago. Articles like this are the reason I'm reconsidering. Genuinely thought-provoking.

  • JA
    Jenny AdamsonNewcastle · 5 hrs ago

    Read this twice. First time I was furious. Second time I started to see the point. Hate when that happens.

  • PG
    Paul GreenwayNottingham · 34 min ago

    Spelling mistake in paragraph four — 'its' should be 'it's'. Otherwise a decent read.

  • FS
    Fiona StewartAberdeen · Yesterday

    Could we have a follow-up piece with actual solutions rather than just describing the problem? Getting tired of diagnosis without prescription.

  • PJ
    Priya JoshiLeicester · 1 hr ago

    The middle section about the long-term consequences is the bit nobody else has written. That's the real story.

Related

Keep reading.